This is a very interesting read on the difficulty of operating at the end of a very long and tenuous tether. Now a Congressional committee has picked up on this topic. Now Time Magazine is in on the act.
MI is maintained by a small dedicated staff. It started several years ago as a research resource for interesting stories. Over time, original content was added. Analytical context is derived from decades of support to NS decision making bodies. Open-source, forward-leaning, our objective is to help shape readers’ understanding of the world in which the US seeks to maintain or gain comparative advantage in strategic affairs. The 9/11 Commission Report’s key lament was the absence of imagination among analysts and decision makers. MI’s intent is to creatively speculate on plausible futures and recommend how their worst effects might be minimized, or, if at all possible, avoided.
This is a Grand Strategy platform. Within that rubric, frequent topics will include countering nuclear weapons and materials of concern; emulation of opposition strategic thinking, threat vectors, and pathways; examination of friend and foe policy and actions; and practical recommendations for improving security for the west.