Hundreds of Terror Training Camps Allowed by Pakistani Military
The Long War Journal has picked up a piece from the Times of India that claims Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed leaders have admitted that "the Pakistani military allows [them] to operate freely and run hundreds of training camps."
Syed Salahuddin, the leader of the Hizbul Mujahideen, admitted that the Pakistani military permits his fighters to move freely and run training camps in the region."Our mujahideen can come and go at their own will," Salahuddin told a local news agency, according to The Times of India. "There is no question that the army can stop us."
The story is interesting but not surprising. Certainly consideration has to be given to the motivations of the source as well as the publication. Both have motivations to make and print these claims, respectively. Syed Salahuddin, like other terrorists before him, gain when they encourage friction between Pakistan and India thereby taking attention and focus away from terror plans to take down the Pakistani state. The Times of India, perhaps understandably, has been at pains to repeatedly say "I told you so" about arch-rival Pakistan's complicity in all things South Asian terror, following OBL's discovery a short walk from Pakistan's West Point.
MI is maintained by a small dedicated staff. It started several years ago as a research resource for interesting stories. Over time, original content was added. Analytical context is derived from decades of support to NS decision making bodies. Open-source, forward-leaning, our objective is to help shape readers’ understanding of the world in which the US seeks to maintain or gain comparative advantage in strategic affairs. The 9/11 Commission Report’s key lament was the absence of imagination among analysts and decision makers. MI’s intent is to creatively speculate on plausible futures and recommend how their worst effects might be minimized, or, if at all possible, avoided.
This is a Grand Strategy platform. Within that rubric, frequent topics will include countering nuclear weapons and materials of concern; emulation of opposition strategic thinking, threat vectors, and pathways; examination of friend and foe policy and actions; and practical recommendations for improving security for the west.